Chemistry is the examine of the framework and change of matter.When Aristotle composed the first systematic treatises top top chemistry inthe fourth century BCE, his conceptual grasp that the nature ofmatter to be tailored to accommodate a fairly simple variety ofobservable phenomena. In the 21st century, chemistry hasbecome the largest scientific discipline, producing over half amillion publications a year ranging from straight empiricalinvestigations to considerable theoretical work. However, thespecialized interest in the theoretical issues emerging in chemistry,hereafter Philosophy that Chemistry, is a fairly recentaddition to ideology of science.

You are watching: What did aristotle contribute to the atomic theory

Philosophy that chemistry has two significant parts. In the first, conceptualissues developing within chemistry are very closely articulated andanalyzed. Such questions which are internal to chemistry encompass thenature that substance, atomism, the chemistry bond, and also synthesis. In thesecond, classic topics in viewpoint of scientific research such as realism,reduction, explanation, confirmation, and modeling space taken increase withinthe paper definition of chemistry.


1. Substances, Elements, and also Chemical mix 2. Atomism 3. The Chemical revolution 4. Framework in Chemistry 5. Mechanism and Synthesis 6. Chemistry Reduction 7. Modeling and also Chemical Explanation

1. Substances, Elements, and Chemical Combination

Our modern understanding of chemistry substances is element andatomic: every substances space composed of atoms of elements such ashydrogen and also oxygen. These atoms space the structure blocks the themicrostructures the compounds and hence are the fundamental units ofchemical analysis. However, the reality of chemical atoms wascontroversial till the beginning of the 20th century andthe expression “fundamental building blocks” has alwaysrequired cautious interpretation. So also today, the case that allsubstances room composed of aspects does not offer us sufficientguidance about the ontological standing of elements and also how the elementsare to it is in individuated.

In this section, we will start with the issue of elements.Historically, chemists have readily available two answers come the question“What is it for something to it is in an element?”

An element is a substance which have the right to exist in the diverted stateand which can not be further analyzed (hereafter the end ofanalysis thesis).An element is a substance which is a ingredient of a compositesubstance (hereafter the actual components thesis).

These two theses describe aspects in different ways. In the first,elements space explicitly identified by a procedure. Facets are simplythe ingredient in a mixture that deserve to be be separated no further. Thesecond conception is an ext theoretical, positing facets asconstituents of composite bodies. In the pre-modern Aristoteliansystem, the finish of evaluation thesis to be the favored option. Aristotlebelieved that aspects were the structure blocks the chemicalsubstances, only potentially existing in these substances. The modernconception of elements asserts the they room actual components,although, together we will see, elements of the end of evaluation thesislinger. This ar will define the theoretical background behindchemistry’s progression from one conception to the other. Follow me theway, we will talk about the persistence of elements in chemicalcombination, the link between facet individuation andclassification, and criteria because that determining pure substances.

1.1 Aristotle’s Chemistry

The earliest conceptual analyses concerning matter and also itstransformations come in the Aristotelian tradition. As in modernchemistry, the focus of Aristotle’s theories was the nature ofsubstances and also their transformations. He available the very first systematictreatises that chemical theory in On Generation and Corruption(De Generatione et Corruptione), Meteorology, andparts of Physics and also On the Heavens (DeCaelo).

Aristotle well-known that many ordinary, product things room composedof many substances, although he thought that few of them can becomposed that a single, pure substance. Thus, he necessary to give acriterion of purity that would individuate a solitary substance. Hiscriterion was the pure substances space homoeomerous: lock arecomposed of like components at every level. “f mix hastaken place, the link must be uniform—any component ofsuch a compound is the very same as the whole, simply as any part of water iswater” (De Generatione et Corruptione,henceforth DG, I.10,328a10ff).<1> Sowhen us encounter diamond in rock, oil in water, or smoke in air,Aristotelian chemistry tells united state that over there is an ext than one substancepresent.

Like several of his predecessors, Aristotle held that the aspects Fire,Water, Air, and also Earth were the building blocks of every substances. Butunlike his predecessors, Aristotle created this list fromfundamental principles. He suggested that “it is impossible for thesame point to it is in hot and also cold, or moist and also dry … Fire is hotand dry, whereas air is hot and also moist …; and also Water is cold andmoist, while earth is cold and also dry” (DG II.3,330a30–330b5). Aristotle supposed hot and moist to it is in maximaldegrees that heat and also humidity, and also cold and dry to it is in minimal degrees.Non-elemental substances are characterized by intermediate levels ofthe primary qualities of warmth and also humidity.

Aristotle offered this elemental theory to account for numerous properties ofsubstances. For instance he distinguished in between liquids and solids bynoting the various properties imposed by 2 characteristicproperties the elements, moist and dry. “oist is the which,being easily adaptable in shape, is not determinable by any kind of limit ofits own; while dry is the which is readily determinable by its ownlimit, but not easily adaptable in shape” (DG II.2,329b30f.). Hard bodies have a shape and also volume of their own, liquidsonly have actually a volume of their own. The further differentiated liquids fromgases, which don’t even have their own volume. He reasoned that whilewater and air are both fluid because they space moist, cold renderswater liquid and also hot provides air gas. On the other hand, dried togetherwith cold makes planet solid, but together with hot we get fire.

Chemistry focuses on an ext than simply the structure blocks that substances:It attempts come account for the changes that adjust substancesinto other kinds the substances. Aristotle additionally contributed the firstimportant analyses that this process, differentiating betweentransmutation, whereby one substance overwhelms and also eliminatesanother and proper mixing. The former is closest come what wewould currently call adjust of phase and also the latter to what we would nowcall chemical combination.

Aristotle assumed that proper mixing could occur when substances ofcomparable quantities are carried together come yield other substancescalled ‘compounds.’<2> Accordingly, the substances we typically encounter are compounds, andall compounds have the function that there space some ingredient fromwhich they could be made.

What wake up to the original ingredients once they are combined togetherto kind a compound? Like modern chemists, Aristotle suggested that theoriginal ingredients can, at the very least in principle, be acquired byfurther transformations. The presumably knew the salt and water deserve to beobtained native sea water and metals can be acquired from alloys. However heexplains this through a theoretical argument, no a thorough list ofobservations.

Aristotle very first argues the heterogeneous mixtures can bedecomposed:

Observation shows that even mixed bodies are often divisible intohomoeomerous parts; instances are flesh, bone, wood, and stone. Sincethen the composite can not be one element, not every homoeomerous bodycan be an element; only, together we claimed before, that which is notdivisible into bodies different in form (De caelo, III.4,302b15–20).

He then goes top top to sell an explicit meaning of the principle of anelement in state of an easy bodies, specifically discussing recovery inanalysis.

An element, us take it, is a body right into which other bodies might beanalyzed, existing in them perhaps or in actuality (which of theseis still disputable), and also not chin divisible right into bodies differentin form. That, or something like it, is what all men in every casemean by aspect (De caelo, III.3, 302a15ff).

The concept of simplicity implicit below is presented late inDG where in book II Aristotle insurance claims that “All thecompound body … are composed of every the straightforward bodies”(334b31). But if all straightforward bodies (elements) are present in allcompounds, exactly how are the various compounds distinguished? v an eye tomore current chemistry, it is natural to think the the differingdegrees the the primary qualities of warmth and humidity thatcharacterize various substances to happen from mix differentproportions the the elements. Possibly Aristotle provides a fleetingreference come this idea once he expresses the power of a productof mix by saying the “the component exhibit the very same ratiobetween that constituents as the whole” (DG I.10,328a8–9 and again in ~ DG II.7, 334b15).

But what go “proportions the the elements” mean? Thecontemporary legislations of continuous and lot of proportions resolve aconcept of element proportions understood on the basis of theconcept that mass. No such principle was available to Aristotle. Theextant texts give tiny indication of just how Aristotle can haveunderstood the idea of elemental proportions, and we have to resort tospeculation (Needham 2009a).

Regardless of exactly how he taken elemental proportions, Aristotle wasquite explicit that while recoverable, facets were not actuallypresent in compounds. In DG I.10 he says that the originalingredients are just potentially, and not actually, existing in theresulting compounds of a mixing process.

There space two factors why in Aristotle’s concept the aspects are notactually present in compounds. The first concerns the way in whichmixing occurs. Mixing just occurs since of the main powers andsusceptibilities of substances to affect and be influenced by othersubstances. This means that every one of the original matter ischanged once a new compound is formed. Aristotle speak usthat compounds are formed when the the contrary contraries are neutralizedand an intermediary state results:

since there are distinctions in degree in hot and also cold, … both through combining damage one another’s excesses so that there existinstead a hot which (for a hot) is cold and also a cold i m sorry (for a cold)is hot; then there will certainly exist … an intermediate. … that isthus, then, … that the end of the aspects there come-to-be fleshand bones and the like—the hot becoming cold and also the coldbecoming hot when they have been carried to the mean. For at the meanis neither hot nor cold. The mean, however, is of significant extentand not indivisible. Similarly, the is in virtue the a typical conditionthat the dry and the moist and the rest create flesh and bone and theremaining compounds. (DG II.7, 334b8–30)

The second reason needs to do through the homogeneity requirement of puresubstances. Aristotle tells united state that “if mix has takenplace, the compound must be uniform—any component of together acompound is the very same as the whole, just as any part of water iswater” (DG I.10, 328a10f.). Since the elements aredefined in regards to the extremes the warmth and also humidity, what hasintermediate degrees of these characteristics is not an element. Beinghomogeneous, every part of a compound has actually the exact same intermediatedegrees of these qualities. Thus, there space no components with extremalqualities, and hence no aspects actually present. His theory of theappearance of new substances therefore implies that the elements arenot actually existing in compounds.

So we reach an amazing theoretical impasse. Aristotle identified theelements by problems they exhibit in isolation and argued the allcompounds are composed the the elements. However, the propertieselements have actually in isolation room nothing the any component of an actuallyexisting compound could have. So exactly how is it possible to recoup theelements?

It is absolutely not easy to know what would induce a link todissociate right into its facets on Aristotle’s theory, i beg your pardon seemsentirely geared to showing exactly how a stable equilibrium results frommixing. The overwhelming type of mixing procedure doesn’t seem to beapplicable. How, for example, could it describe the separation the saltand water native sea water? yet the trouble for the advocates of theactual presence of elements is to characterize lock in state ofproperties displayed in both isolated and combined states.The general problem of adequately meeting this challenge, either indefense of the potential existence or actual presence view, is theproblem that mixture (Cooper 2004; good 1995, hardwood &Weisberg 2004).

In summary, Aristotle laid the thoughtful groundwork because that allsubsequent discussions of elements, pure substances, and chemicalcombination. He asserted the all pure substances were homoeomerousand created of the aspects air, earth, fire, and also water. Theseelements were no actually existing in these substances; rather, thefour elements were potentially present. Your potential existence couldbe revealed by further analysis and transformation.

1.2 Lavoisier’s Elements

Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794) is often called the father ofmodern chemistry, and also by 1789 he had developed a perform of the elementsthat a modern-day chemist would recognize. Lavoisier’s list, however, wasnot the same to our modern-day one. Some items such as hydrogen andoxygen gases were concerned as compounds by Lavoisier, although us nowknow regard hydrogen and also oxygen as elements and also their gases asmolecules.

Other item on his list were remnants of the Aristotelian device whichhave no location at all in the contemporary system. Because that example, fire remainedon his list, although in the rather altered type of caloric. Wait isanalyzed into several components: the respirable part called oxygenand the remainder called azote or nitrogen. Four types of earth founda location on his list: lime, magnesia, barytes, and also argill. Thecomposition of these earths space “totally unknown, and, till bynew discoveries their constituent elements are ascertained, us arecertainly authorized to consider them as an easy bodies” (1789,p. 157), back Lavoisier goes on come speculate that “all thesubstances we speak to earths might be only metallic oxyds” (1789, p.159).

What is particularly important around Lavoisier’s mechanism is hisdiscussion of just how the elemental basis of specific compounds isdetermined. For example, he defines how water have the right to be shown to be acompound that hydrogen and oxygen (1789, pp. 83–96). Hewrites:

When 16 ounces of alcohol are burned in an apparatus properly adaptedfor collecting every the water disengaged during the combustion, weobtain indigenous 17 come 18 ounces that water. Together no substance have the right to furnish aproduct bigger than its initial bulk, the follows, the something elsehas united v the alcohol throughout its combustion; and I have alreadyshown that this should be oxygen, or the basic of air. Thus alcoholcontains hydrogen, which is one of the elements of water; and also theatmospheric air has oxygen, i m sorry is the other aspect necessaryto the ingredient of water (1789, p. 96).

The metaphysical principle of the conservation of matter—thatmatter deserve to be neither produced nor ruined in chemicalprocesses—called upon right here is at the very least as old as Aristotle(Weisheipl 1963). What the existing passage illustrates is theemployment of a standard of conservation: the conservation of mass.The total mass that the assets must come from the fixed of thereactants, and if this is no to be discovered in the easily visible ones,then there have to be other, less readily visible reactants.

This principle permitted Lavoisier to put what to be essentiallyAristotle’s concept of an easy substances (302a15ff., quoted in section1.1) to much more effective experimental use. Straight after rejectingatomic theories, he says “if we use the termelements, or principles the bodies, to express ouridea that the last point which evaluation is qualified of reaching, us mustadmit, together elements, every the substances right into which we room capable, byany means, to reduce bodies by decomposition” (1789, p. Xxiv).In various other words, facets are identified as the smallest materials ofsubstances that us can produce experimentally. The principle of theconservation of mass noted for a default of when a chemicalchange was a decomposition into much easier substances, which to be decisivein getting rid of of the phlogiston theory. The increase in load oncalcination meant, in the irradiate of this principle, that calcinationwas not a decomposition, as the phlogiston theorists would have actually it,but the formation of a more complicated compound.

Despite the pragmatic character of this definition, Lavoisier feltfree come speculate around the compound nature that the earths, too asthe formation of steel oxides which required the decomposition ofoxygen gas. Thus, Lavoisier additionally developed the notion of an aspect asa theoretical, last allude of evaluation concept. While this last pointof analysis conception remained an essential notion for Lavoisier asit was for Aristotle, his concept was a significant advance overAristotle’s and provided the basis for more theoretical development inthe 19th century (Hendry 2005).

1.3 Mendeleev’s periodic Table

Lavoisier’s list of elements was corrected and elaborated with thediscovery that many new elements in the 19th century. For example,Humphrey Davy (1778–1829) secluded sodium and also potassium byelectrolysis, demonstrating that Lavoisier’s earths were actuallycompounds. In addition, caloric disappeared indigenous the list of acceptedelements with the discovery of the very first law of thermodynamics in the1840s. Hence with this changing, but growing, number of elements,chemists progressively recognized the need for a systematization. Manyattempts were made, but very early influential account was provided by JohnNewlands (1837–98) who prepared the very first periodic table showingthat 62 the the 63 climate known elements follow an “octave”rule according to i beg your pardon every eighth element has similarproperties.

See more: How To Change The Combination On A Vaultz Lock Box ? How Do I Reset My Vaultz Lock Box

Later, Lothar Meyer (1830–95) and Dmitrij Mendeleev(1834–1907) separately presented regular tables covering all63 aspects known in 1869. In 1871, Mendeleev published his periodictable in the kind it was subsequently acclaimed. This table wasorganized top top the idea of regularly recurring general functions asthe aspects are complied with when sequentially notified by family member atomicweight. The regularly recurring similarities of chemistry behaviorprovided the basis of organizing facets into groups. He determined 8such groups throughout 12 horizontal periods, which, provided that he wasworking with just 63 elements, expected there were several holes.