After the polite War two amendments were added to the U.S. Structure that clearly guaranteed the legal rights of afri Americans together citizens. The 14th modification (ratified in 1868) prohibited states from denying the "equal protection" that its regulations to any person. The 15th Amendment come the U.S. Structure (ratified in 1870) affirmed that "he appropriate of citizens of the United states to vote shall not be refuse or abridged through the United states or by any State on account that race, color, or previous problem of servitude."

Though they to be written right into the foundational file of our government, these promises were not really well secured in the claims of the former Confederacy in the decades after Reconstruction. Various legal and illegal tools were emerged on the state level to disenfranchise afri Americans and other minorities.

You are watching: What was the reaction to the supreme court decision in nixon v. herndon?

One tool an especially favored in Texas to be the "white primary," originally established by inner political party rules and later by state law. The an easy idea was to clearly prohibit non-whites (African americans primarily, but likewise Mexican americans in south Texas) from joining the democratic Party or participating in that the primary elections.

Because the democratic Party conquered the political solution of every the Southern says after Reconstruction, the state and local main elections usually determined which candidate would ultimately win office in the basic election. Thus, any voters excluded indigenous the democratic primary were effectively excluded indigenous exercising any meaningful electoral choice.

In Texas ~ the rotate of the twentieth century plenty of local party leaders embraced rules that barred afri Americans (and mexico Americans in southern Texas) indigenous voting in autonomous Party primary elections. But, as soon as the Texas Legislature passed a legislation in 1923 explicitly barring african Americans from participating in the democratic Party primary, it fired the opening salvo in a two-decade long legal and political struggle whose result hinged on even if it is a party could or need to be regarded as a private entity v the appropriate to develop its own interior rules.

The 1923 law was overturned as unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in Nixon v. Herndon (1927) because that violating the equal defense clause the the 14th Amendment. The decision addressed just the facts of the case before it, which pertained to state law not the plans of individual politics parties. In solution the Texas Legislature pass a brand-new law allowing the executive, management committee of every state party to decision who could vote in its very own primary. In Nixon v. Condon (1932), again citing the "equal protection" clause, the U.S. Can be fried Court struck under the statute and also the executive, management committee resolution banning african American participation in the autonomous primary.

In solution the Texas democratic state convention adopted a resolution banning african Americans indigenous participating in the Party"s primary. Against the advice of the NAACP personal citizens in Houston promptly tested the resolution in court. In Grovey v. Townsend (1935) the supreme Court unanimously made decision that the democratic Party to be a private company whose state convention could determine member qualifications. Later, these same Houstonians – this time working along with the NAACP – fought back, pass the case of Lonnie E. Smith, a Houston dentist, come the U.S. Supreme Court.

In blacksmith v. Allwright (1944), eight justices on a supreme Court v several new members i rejected the Grovey decision. The majority concluded that several state regulations made the Texas primary more than just a role of a private organization. Instead, these laws made it an integral component of the electoral process. As a consequence, the court ruled, it was unconstitutional come prohibit afri Americans from voting in the autonomous primary, including votes because that party officials.

Smith v. Allwright did not prevent various other attempts to disenfranchise african Americans. But it efficiently ended the white main in Texas, a major step follow me the path to securing same voting rights.

See more: What Type Of Bond Is Present In A Water Molecule ? Types Of Covalent Bonds: Polar And Nonpolar


You are at this time viewing a legacy feature of the Texas national politics Project website. You re welcome visit the increased Texas politics Project website to learn much more about ours updated webtext and to find additional educational resources.