Is this yes, really a paradox? God, in ~ the point in time when the concern is posed, is Omnipotent - therefore he must be able to. Yet in producing something that He cannot later move, does this power just come in ~ the expense of his very own Omnipotence?

Does denying God the power to die also deny his Omnipotence?


*

No God cannot produce a rock that he cannot lift. But just because he can"t execute this doesn"t mean he"s no all powerful, simply that he can"t execute the logically impossible.


Descartes gives us at least two different ways approximately this paradox. The very first comes straight out of Catholic dogma.

You are watching: Can god make a rock he cannot lift answer

By Christian thinking (and Hindu, for that matter), God did become finite (in the latter case, over and over again), he simply remained omnipotent at the same time in a different form. God in the kind of the Creator (or Vishnu) can easily do a rock that God in the type of Jesus (or Krishna) might not lift.

By the magical reasonable of trinitarianism (or alternately through the non-dual translate of what an avatar yes, really is), employing this notion, Descartes both multiplies and also does no infringe the unity of God. That cannot make sense to humans, but by dogma, that is ours problem, not God"s. So over there is no logic in insisting the by God, girlfriend did not typical his incarnations or avatars, due to the fact that there is no distinction, even though the distinction is clear and also obvious to us, the distinction we firmly insist upon is just an artifact of person limitation, not an facet of reality.

The second way around the paradox comes from much more directly considering the nature the omnipotence. An omnipotent being, through Descartes logic, might create square circles, yet those would need to exist in a method humans could not recognize them; uneven he also adjusted humans... If God deserve to do everything, actual or unreal, conceivable or inconceivable, feasible or impossible, the paradox goes away. You just finish up through lots of copies of God and worlds full of absolute nonsense (at least from a human point of view) in a Meinongian, modal-realist kind of way.

Descartes" real suggest is that not only is God the being that creates stuff, he is likewise the being the creates rules, consisting of rules around possibilities. And also he is cost-free to readjust them, or to create exceptions. This is the principle of miracles, and also miracles room pretty lot the point of having actually a God who intercedes.

See more: Watson 853 Pill With Watson 853 On It Artrate, Dobbs Ferry Pharmacy

The God who makes up both the stuff and the rules has no problem at all through your paradox. God can clearly make up a rock the occupies the whole of space. That rock, the course, cannot be moved. The i can not qualify to relocate it is not about power, it is implicitly in the an interpretation of room (and of the entirety thereof). But Descartes" God is also free to simply add a measurement to space, therefore he can move the rock. And he could then broaden his rock to be four-dimensional and fill the space, which he can then move in a brand-new fifth dimension. An limitless regress, yet not a paradox.